Creating an NRaas project Attn C# Devs: Overwatch

Talk nerdy to us here.
User avatar
JunJayMdM
Reactions:
Posts: 262
Joined: April 2nd, 2012, 6:00 pm

Post by JunJayMdM » January 26th, 2014, 7:35 pm

<ul><li>DoLoop() or DoTimedLoop(), the latter especially, cos the first one is a delegate function, in case you want something to be done while waiting for each loop to end</li></ul>

User avatar
JunJayMdM
Reactions:
Posts: 262
Joined: April 2nd, 2012, 6:00 pm

Post by JunJayMdM » January 28th, 2014, 5:04 pm

About the SkillGainModifier, personally I'm not having those issues but I'm using the Testing version, it might be possible that Twallan had it corrected already and we didn't know. My Sims gain skills just fine, although I didn't check Vampires, which I will do. I just want to point out that some of the issues being reported might have been corrected already and not everyone is using the Testing version

User avatar
Chain_Reaction
Site Admin
Reactions:
Posts: 7624
Joined: December 30th, 2011, 6:00 pm
Answers: 82
Contact:

Post by Chain_Reaction » January 30th, 2014, 1:37 am

No changes noted between 111 and 113 in that section of the code so I'd say if he changed something it was before then.

User avatar
JunJayMdM
Reactions:
Posts: 262
Joined: April 2nd, 2012, 6:00 pm

Post by JunJayMdM » January 30th, 2014, 6:48 am

The 'Stuck Check' code was changed too but there was no mention of it, unless it was just limited to the new settings. They're just assumptions anyway, all we can do is test and see for ourselves

User avatar
JunJayMdM
Reactions:
Posts: 262
Joined: April 2nd, 2012, 6:00 pm

Post by JunJayMdM » January 30th, 2014, 7:12 am

BTW V112 are the changes you see noted in the project, just Twallan's changes, while V113 is a change to "YieldAllAlarms" made by me because the original one was creating issues at high speed, not necessarily long durations, cos I had them after just a few hours. I didn't write them at first, that's why you couldn't find them :)

User avatar
Chain_Reaction
Site Admin
Reactions:
Posts: 7624
Joined: December 30th, 2011, 6:00 pm
Answers: 82
Contact:

Post by Chain_Reaction » January 30th, 2014, 11:29 pm

Thanks, i updated the revision notes. :)

User avatar
JunJayMdM
Reactions:
Posts: 262
Joined: April 2nd, 2012, 6:00 pm

Post by JunJayMdM » February 6th, 2014, 12:11 pm

@Chain I spent one day insulting whoever created GitHub because whenever I create a Pull Request it adds all the commits with no regard. I tried different solutions with creating new branches and commands found around with google but nothing works and it insists on wanting to add the commits where I merged yours with mine. Until I figure out something, this is the commit I wanted to pull.

I already updated the version number so any change made will refer to 114. I kept the old ones marked with 113 in case we need them

User avatar
Chain_Reaction
Site Admin
Reactions:
Posts: 7624
Joined: December 30th, 2011, 6:00 pm
Answers: 82
Contact:

Post by Chain_Reaction » February 7th, 2014, 2:26 am

No worries, just send a pull request and I'll sort it out. I learned an easy way from last time. :)

User avatar
JunJayMdM
Reactions:
Posts: 262
Joined: April 2nd, 2012, 6:00 pm

Post by JunJayMdM » February 7th, 2014, 10:20 am

Great, I'll do it later then :)

User avatar
Chain_Reaction
Site Admin
Reactions:
Posts: 7624
Joined: December 30th, 2011, 6:00 pm
Answers: 82
Contact:

Post by Chain_Reaction » February 12th, 2014, 6:11 pm

Query on the intention of that change so I can include it in the revision notes? I'm about to roll out 114. :)

Post Reply